Showing posts with label VAT / TVA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VAT / TVA. Show all posts

Monday, 9 July 2012

Coup d’état in Romania?! Or just an outburst of orange hysteria?[Lovitură de stat în România?! Sau doar o răbufnire de isterie portocalie?]

There are no tanks rolling down the streets of Bucharest, no one has been arrested or exiled, public gatherings are still taking place in the city centre. It’s Code Orange again – but not because of the political turmoil.

It’s the crazy weather once more – this time the scorching heat, not the heavy snowing and blizzards.

The ‘civilised world’ – the EU (especially Germany) + the USA & others – have expressed their concerns and preoccupation with the sad fact that their beloved orange hero of 2004 was wrongfully (so they claim) impeached a few days ago.

These high priests of democracy decry the fact that Băsescu could have been executed’ by votes in the Romanian Parliament. But it’s all a hysterical reaction.

Votes are no bullets. These are the same votes that have recently installed an Islamist (albeit moderate) president in Egypt, the same that sent spirited Nicolas Sarkozy to early retirement, and the same that will probably oust Angela Merkel from power in 2013.

Happen what may – a bigger evil than Băsescu can always befall Romania; but this is no reason for not removing the current evil – I am siding with those that, on July 29, will vote YES to confirm his impeachment.

He has never been the honest fighter for democracy, the defender of an independent judiciary, the committed supporter of the rule of law, nor the reformist whom the foreign media kept portaying over the past decade.

He has been an authoritarian, abusive, antidemocratic, and arrogant president who could never put up with the imperfections of Romania’s Constitution.

As a matter of fact, back in 2004, he had promised that he wouldn’t be an neutral president, but a kind of player-President.” And he surely kept his promise, and played aggressively.

Whether a man like him, considered to be a creation of the former Communist secret services, has already played all his trumps is difficult to say. Used to steering a 306-meter long oil tanker, Băsescu is skilled at turning adverse odds in his favour.

Exposing the plagiarism of the current Prime Minister only hastened his impeachment, although it wasn’t a decisive blow to his adversaries, that would assure the survival of his moribund orange regime.

The average voter doesn’t know what plagiarism is. But Băsescu may still have some aces left in his sleeves.

His orange supporters are enraged, desperately trying to convinge the Sublime Porte of 2012 – which is not Ottoman Istanbul anymore, but Brussels and Washington DC – that a coup d’état has taken place in Romania, thus a referendum would be illegitimate.

Some of their arguments are valid, yet so are many of those against Băsescu’s rule. He was not the enlightened reformist of democratic institutions often described by foreign fans and internal worshippers, but a rather constant saboteour of democracy.

Most of all, irrespective whether he did it constitutionally or not, he is a shameless liar – and his irresponsible lies amount to (if not even surpass) the gravity of high treason.

Out of his abundance of lies, it’s worth noting only those with catastrophical economic consequences. In the autumn of 2008, as the global economic crisis began breaking havoc elsewhere in the world, he said Romania would not be affected.

Even more so, he said the wages of teachers should be increased by 50% and accused the liberal Prime Minister of refusing to provide the funds for his irresponsible claims.

In the meantime, his orange clique (PDL) was promising a 6.5% percent economic growth for 2009. At the end of that year, the economy would contract by 7.2%.

A bit later, in January 2009, he said that Romania would not need an IMF loan. In May 2009, Romania loaned 20 billions euros from the IMF and the European Commission.

Where did the money go? In the coffers of foreign banks, in the pockets of ‘orange’ companies, but surely nowhere in the benefit of Romanians who refuse to bite the bullet.

Although prescribed as a life-or-death necessity, with obstinance and cynicism spit at the ‘lazy Romanians’, it is still arguable whether Romania was in a such desperate need of a bailout. Or was it more an experimetal medicine forced down our throats by Doctor Băsescu?

A year later, in May 2010, Băsescu subjected Romanians to a fierce austerity experiment – a 25% wage cut in the public sector, and a 5% VAT increase.

Some may argue that any of these are but inoffensive (to the degree they are constitutional’) lies and a kind of inherent mistakes of democracy that can’t be punished in any democratic society.

What if they are not as innocent as we are told they are? Băsescu’s orange gang was one of cunning profiteers, thus most of his (and his regime’s) apparent mistakes look like sheer premeditated crimes.

A yesman of Washington DC, of Brussels, and of Berlin (where some of his most voiceful supporters are heard these days), he did nothing in favour of Romania – only in favour of the orange myriad of interests that he patronized.

He is a fake hero of democracy, an indecent patron of a corrupt regime whom most voters in Romania (hopefully – it’s risky to say anything more these days) don’t want as president anymore.

There’s no lack of easily corruptible yesmen in Romania, therefore no one in Washington DC, Brussels or Berlin should worry about Băsescu being thrown into the dustbin of history.  

Romanians should be as concerned about the democratic world’s crocodile tears for the fate of Romanian democracy as those cynics in the aforementioned capitals were worried when Băsescu was pushing this impoverished and abused nation through the steepest chasm of austerity ever seen in the EU.

[For all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Friday, 28 October 2011

[EN] Worth trying in the UK / [RO] Merită încercat în UK (21)

[EN] Having tasted them twice (in 2008 and 2009), I recommend these pies as something worth trying in the UK. [RO] După ce le-am gustat de două ori (în 2008 şi 2009), recomand aceste plăcinte ca ceva demn de încercat în UK.

[EN] I’m not sure they are typically Scottish; I’m only sure that I liked these pies made by at the Pie Maker, Edinburgh. [RO] Nu-s sigur că sunt tipic scoţiene; sunt sigur doar că mi-au plăcut aceste plăcinte făcute la Pie Maker, Edinburgh.

[EN] Similar pies (partially resembling the West Cornwall Pasty) can be found in about a dozen places only around South Bridge. [RO] Plăcinte similare (parţial asemănătoare cu West Cornwall Pasty) pot fi găsite în vreo duzină de locuri doar în jurul South Bridge.

[EN] Like in most UK fast food outlets, the employees were immigrants. [RO] Ca în cele mai multe localuri fast food din UK, angajaţii erau imigranţi…

[EN] …a puny Portuguese woman baking the pies, and a hulky Polish (smiling in the first pic :-) guy selling them. [RO] …o micuţă portugheză cocea plăcintele şi un polonez masiv (care zâmbeşte în prima poză :-) le vindea.

[EN] A poster claimed that these pastry products contain less calories than the average double sandwich… [RO] Un afiş pretindea că aceste produse de patiserie conţin mai puţine calorii decât un sandviş dublu obişnuit...

[EN] …that is the ‘slow killer’ whose weapons are butter, cream, and mayonnaise filling. [RO] …adică ‘ucigaşul lent’ ale cărui arme sunt untul, smântâna şi maioneza.

[EN] I don't know how true this claim is, however, this kind of pies make a difference from the offer of… cold sandwiches. [RO] Nu ştiu cât de adevărată este pretenţia aceasta, totuşi, acest tip de plăcinte sunt ceva diferit de oferta de… sandvişuri reci.

[EN] For who’s interested, some exclusively vegetarian fillings can be considered a good fasting food. [RO] Pentru cine este interesat, câteva umpluturi exclusiv vegetariene pot fi considerate o buna mâncare de post.

[EN] The slogan “prices are born here but raised elsewhere” was probably not far form reality. [RO] Sloganul “preţurile se nasc aici, dar sunt crescute altundeva” probabil că nu era departe de realitate.

[EN] The cheapest pie (containing beef or pork sausage) was no more than 85 pence, while the most expensive one cost £ 1.80. [RO] Cea mai ieftină plăcintă (conţinând carne de vită sau cârnat de porc) costa £ 1,80.

[EN] Most other pies (with meat, vegetable or fruit fillings) cost £ 1.20-1.35. But these were pre-VAT increase prices… [RO] Cele mai multe alte plăcinte (cu umpluturi de carne, legume sau fructe costau £ 1,20-1,35. Dar acestea erau preţuri pre-creşterea TVA

[For all the episodes of this series, and all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate episoadele din această serie şi toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Friday, 7 October 2011

Ochelari de soare contra unei lumi strălucitoare [Sunglasses against a glittering world]

Sunt ochelarist, dar nu din acela ‘de soare’, ci de… miopie. Iar în miopia mea sunt multe lucruri pe care nu le prea văd eu limpede pe lume. De pildă, port în gând o curiorizate care mă macină de mai multă vreme.

Oare cum arăta lumea înaintea folosirii  în masă – din a doua jumătate a secolului trecut, dar excesiv doar de vreo 20-30 de ani încoace, aş zice – a ochelarilor de soare?

Aud tot mai mult în jur oameni zicând că ‘au nevoie’ de ochelari de soare, de preferinţă nu din aceia made in China’, ci cât mai de calitate (de pildă made in Italy). Această nevoie este reclamată chiar de unii care prea puţin stau în aer liber.

Oare cum suportau strămoşii noştri nu prea îndepărtaţi (bunicii şi străbunicii) lumina soarelui, în bătaia căreia petreceau mult mai mult timp decât noi?

Şi nu scurtă vreme, pentru câte o plimbărică până la un loc cu umbră, şi nici pentru o simplă relaxare, ci ca să facă munci grele: la sapă, la coasă, la fân, la secerat, la cărat una-alta, la spălat şi întins rufele, la câte şi mai câte.

Un răspuns parţial aş găsi: pe vremea aceea (nu mai în urmă de 50-60 de ani), nimeni nu ieşea din casă cu tărtăcuţa descoperită.

O năframă, borurile pălăriei sau cozorocul şepcii mai îndepărtau măcar o parte din lumină din calea spre ochi, deşi văd că, în zilele noastre, specialiştii (cine alţii? :-) pretind că până şi rama ochelarilor de soare ar trebui să fie groasă, pentru o protecţie sporită.

Însă şi astăzi, bombardaţi fiind cu mesaje care ne cer ‘să ne protejăm’, nu prea mai ieşim din cu capul descoperit, ci poate doar gol (de gânduri). Totuşi, indiferent ce om avea pe cap, de ce nevoia de ochelari de soare este tot mai mare?

Nu îmi explic. Petrecem noi mai mult în arşiţa zilei decât o făceau înaintaşii noştri, muncind din greu? Oare arde soarele mai tare, cum or zice unii ideologi ai încălzirii globale?

O fi ajuns lumea mai insuportabil de privit cu ochiul liber? Sau, poate, nu mai vrem să ni se vadă cearcănele, gândurile, confuzia, tristeţea, neliniştea? Ori să ne ascundem mai uşor zâmbetele false?

Să fie cumva ochelarii de soare un element obligatoriu pentru a a accede la ‘balul mascat’ ce a devenit lumea contemporană?

Mai întâi ochelarii de soare, apoi walkman-ul, iPod-ul, Smartphone-ul şi tot aşa… Accesorii indispensabile (?!) în trista lume reală din jur, fără de care mulţi nu pot apărea nici în (ne)fericita lume virtuală a Facebook.

Cum sunt destui care nu ies în lume, nici după lăsarea serii, fără ochelari cumpăraţi cu 102[a], 136[b], 140[c] sau 187[d] GBP – preţuri din Edinburgh (poza 3) de dinainte de creşterea TVA în UK şi, chipurile, unii la reducere cu până la 50%.

Nu cred ca protecţia sporită să explice preţurile afişate, ci mai degrabă fandoseala… Fendi[a], Prada[b], Gucci[c], Christian Dior[d].

Oricât de scumpi, ochelarii nu pot nici să ne ascundă preagolul (de bune) sau preaplinul (de rele) care ni se văd în ochi. Nici să ne facă mai suportabilă lumea din jur, care nu poate arăta mai bine decât arată nevăzutele inimi ale miliardelor de pâmânteni.
                                                                                                                                       
[Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la/For all the posts on this blog go to: Contents/Cuprins]