Saturday, 30 April 2011

[EN] No comment / [RO] Fără comentarii (8) – Dangerous readings / Lecturi periculoase

[EN] When in the UK, beware of motorcycle riders busy with… reading. Când vă aflaţi în UK, atenţie la motociclişti ocupaţi cu… cititiul. [RO] Când vă aflaţi în UK, atenţie la motociclişti ocupaţi cu... cititul.

[EN] My reader C.L. (a photoholic like I am :-) has a photo proving this ‘risk’. [RO] Cititoarea mea C.L. (o fotoholică precum sunt eu :-) are o fotografie care dovedeşte acestrisc.

[For all the episodes of this series, and all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate episoadele din această serie şi toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Friday, 29 April 2011

A royal irrelevance [O irelevanţă regală]

Is an event about which over two billion people (from all over, even the remotes corners of the world) talk about these days really relevant?

There’s no doubt that a massive hysteria has engulfed the country (a funny approach to it in The Independent) for the past months, but let’s assume this is not necessarily something bad. 

As long as Americans feed on the ‘presidential myth’ (resuscitated by Obamania in 2008), why shouldn’t the Brits have their own ‘royal myth’ revived?

Nevertheless, I dare ask: will this royal wedding boast British national pride, will it help weave back the national fabric torn by decades of multiculturalism? Will it change anything for the better for this nation? 

Is Great Britain’s Monarchy “a public relations stunt for British capitalism,” as the Trotskyists from The Socialist Worker claim?

To what extent is the Royal Family an asset or a burdening liability? Will the royal subjects feel duped when the news of a royal divorce will break? 

Would anyone invoke the cost of the ceremony – tens of millions of pounds, taken from HM Treasury’s (the taxpayers’) coffers, not from Her Majesty’s purse – if the country were to sink deeper into the economic crisis it has endured for the past years?

There’s hardly any doubt that a royal ceremony is an astonishing thing to watch – worth exploiting as a ‘great show’. Yet how relevant it actually is for today’s Britain?

May the Lord – Whose name was often invoked by Anglican wedding ceremony – bless Prince William and his wife Catherine! ...but I’m afraid no blessing ever comes from such ‘great shows’.

Especially if the ‘blessing’ was given by a dying institution (the Church of England) which is so far from truly knowing the Lord Whom the last Orthodox kings of England (before 1066) were serving.

[For all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Wednesday, 27 April 2011

[EN] Not worth trying in the UK / [RO] Nu merită încercat în UK (18)

[EN] I like parks and very often stop to admire interesting buildings like the one hosting this Serpentine Gallery in Kensington Gardens.

[RO] Îmi plac parcurile şi foarte adesea mă opresc să admir clădiri interesante precum cea care adăposteşte această Serpentine Gallery din Kensington Gardens.

[EN] Sometimes I like the building so much that I say to myself that there is definitely something ‘worth seeing’ inside it.

[RO] Uneori, îmi place clădirea atât de mult, astfel încât îmi spun că este ceva categoric demn de văzut’ înăuntrul ei.

[EN] Unless you are a fanatical pop art admirer, it’s really not worth entering this building – you’d better enjoy the outside view!

[RO] Doar dacă nu eşti un fanatic admirator de pop art, chiar nu merită să intri în această clădire – mai bine ai admira priveliştea de afară!

[For all the episodes of this series, and all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate episoadele din această serie şi toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Thursday, 21 April 2011

Why ALL things are going from bad to worse [De ce TOATE lucrurile merg din rău în mai rău]

Beyond chocolate bunnies, painted eggs, lamb steak, and the utterly un-Christian binge eating and drinking associated with ‘celebratingPascha by many (maybe not only in Romania?!), we all feel that things are going from bad to worse in the world.

The civil war in Libya (leading to another oil price hike),  the nuclear emergency in Japan, the ongoing effects of the Wall Street crash of 2008, the subsequent world economic crisis, the persistent fiscal crisis in the Eurozone (EMU), the looming food crisis

…along with all sorts of surging ‘personal crises’ (death, disease, divorce, unemployment – to name but a few of the commonest) are showing that the world drifts farther and farther away from the relatively optimistic 1990s and early 2000s.

For this part of the world (Eastern Europe), the fall of Communism (1989-1991), the opening of the Schengen Area for Romanians (2002), and the prospect of EU Accession (2004 & 2007) were reasons to hope for the better.

Not anymore. Fewer and fewer of the hopes blossoming in the past two decades appear likely to ever turn into ripe fruits. Some of those phantasms may eventually prove to be bitter fruits.

Every now and then, some of us may be enjoying temporary ‘successes’, nevertheless, we cannot be ignorant of the self-destructive tendencies of the world around us.

Of course, there are all sorts of blind ideologues that keep saying that everything bad (namely the current global economic crisis) “will pass,”  and things will return to ‘normal’ sooner or later.

Wasn’t Ceauşescu equally confident that his unchallenged reign would last? Weren’t many blind ‘thinkers’ between WWI and WWII who imagined that Hitler could be ‘appeased’ and peace safeguarded?

Thoughout the ages, right before ‘worse times’ struck mankind, the world was never in short supply of the same kind of hallucinating optimists that we can hear these days.

To me, worse things appear much more likely to happen in the world than better ones. Yet there should be no room for despair in the heart of someone clinging on to the truth that Christ is Risen!

To those dismissing this salute as ‘anachronistic’, to those truly aware that it is the only thing world of believe for the past two millenia, to believers and unbelievers alike…

…I am dedicating the following text written by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. It is a comprehensive explanation (a speech from 1983) of why things are going from bad to worse in our world.

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---

“Men Have Forgotten God”
(from The Templeton Address) – Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

More than half a century ago, while I was still a child, I recall hearing a number of older people offer the following explanation for the great disasters that had befallen Russia: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.

Since then I have spent well-nigh fifty years working on the history of our Revolution; in the process I have read hundreds of books, collected hundreds of personal testimonies, and have already contributed eight volumes of my own toward the effort of clearing away the rubble left by that upheaval.

But if I were asked today to formulate as concisely as possible the main cause of the ruinous Revolution that swallowed up some sixty million of our people, I could not put it more accurately than to repeat: Men have forgotten God; that’s why all this has happened.

What is more, the events of the Russian Revolution can only be understood now, at the end of the century, against the background of what has since occurred in the rest of the world. What emerges here is a process of universal significance.

And if I were called upon to identify briefly the principal trait of the entire twentieth century, here too, I would be unable to find anything more precise and pithy than to repeat once again: Men have forgotten God.

The failings of human consciousness, deprived of its divine dimension, have been a determining factor in all the major crimes of this century.

The first of these was World War I, and much of our present predicament can be traced back to it. It was a war (the memory of which seems to be fading) when Europe, bursting with health and abundance, fell into a rage of self-mutilation which could not but sap its strength for a century or more, and perhaps forever.

The only possible explanation for this war is a mental eclipse among the leaders of Europe due to their lost awareness of a Supreme Power above them. Only a godless embitterment could have moved ostensibly Christian states to employ poison gas, a weapon so obviously beyond the limits of humanity.

The same kind of defect, the flaw of a consciousness lacking all divine dimension, was manifested after World War II when the West yielded to the satanic temptation of the “nuclear umbrella.”

It was equivalent to saying: Let’s cast off worries, let’s free the younger generation from their duties and obligations, let’s make no effort to defend ourselves, to say nothing of defending others-let’s stop our ears to the groans emanating from the East, and let us live instead in the pursuit of happiness.

If danger should threaten us, we shall be protected by the nuclear bomb; if not, then let the world burn in Hell for all we care.

The pitifully helpless state to which the contemporary West has sunk is in large measure due to this fatal error: the belief that the defense of peace depends not on stout hearts and steadfast men, but solely on the nuclear bomb…

Today’ s world has reached a stage which, if it had been described to preceding centuries, would have called forth the cry: “This is the Apocalypse!” Yet we have grown used to this kind of world; we even feel at home in it.

Dostoevsky warned that “great events could come upon us and catch us intellectually unprepared.” This is precisely what has happened. And he predicted that “the world will be saved only after it has been possessed by the demon of evil.”

Whether it really will be saved we shall have to wait and see: this will depend on our conscience, on our spiritual lucidity, on our individual and combined efforts in the face of catastrophic circumstances.

But it has already come to pass that the demon of evil, like a whirlwind, triumphantly circles all five continents of the earth…

In its past, Russia did know a time when the social ideal was not fame, or riches, or material success, but a pious way of life. Russia was then steeped in an Orthodox Christianity which remained true to the Church of the first centuries.

The Orthodoxy of that time knew how to safeguard its people under the yoke of a foreign occupation that lasted more than two centuries, while at the same time fending off iniquitous blows from the swords of Western crusaders.

During those centuries the Orthodox faith in our country became part of the very pattern of thought and the personality of our people, the forms of daily life, the work calendar, the priorities in every undertaking, the organization of the week and of the year. Faith was the shaping and unifying force of the nation.

But in the 17th century Russian Orthodoxy was gravely weakened by an internal schism. In the 18th, the country was shaken by Peter’s forcibly imposed transformations, which favored the economy, the state, and the military at the expense of the religious spirit and national life.

And along with this lopsided Petrine enlightenment, Russia felt the first whiff of secularism; its subtle poisons permeated the educated classes in the course of the 19th century and opened the path to Marxism.

By the time of the Revolution, faith had virtually disappeared in Russian educated circles; and amongst the uneducated, its health was threatened.

It was Dostoevsky, once again, who drew from the French Revolution and its seeming hatred of the Church the lesson that “revolution must necessarily begin with atheism.

That is absolutely true. But the world had never before known a godlessness as organized, militarized, and tenaciously malevolent as that practiced by Marxism.

Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin, and at the heart of their psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force, more fundamental than all their political and economic pretensions.

Militant atheism is not merely incidental or marginal to Communist policy; it is not a side effect, but the central pivot.

The 1920’s in the USSR witnessed an uninterrupted procession of victims and martyrs amongst the Orthodox clergy. Two metropolitans were shot, one of whom, Veniamin of Petrograd, had been elected by the popular vote of his diocese.

Patriarch Tikhon himself passed through the hands of the Cheka-GPU and then died under suspicious circumstances. Scores of archbishops and bishops perished.

Tens of thousands of priests, monks, and nuns, pressured by the Chekists to renounce the Word of God, were tortured, shot in cellars, sent to camps, exiled to the desolate tundra of the far North, or turned out into the streets in their old age without food or shelter.

All these Christian martyrs went unswervingly to their deaths for the faith; instances of apostasy were few and far between.

For tens of millions of laymen access to the Church was blocked, and they were forbidden to bring up their children in the Faith: religious parents were wrenched from their children and thrown into prison, while the children were turned from the faith by threats and lies…

For a short period of time, when he needed to gather strength for the struggle against Hitler, Stalin cynically adopted a friendly posture toward the Church.

This deceptive game, continued in later years by Brezhnev with the help of showcase publications and other window dressing, has unfortunately tended to be taken at its face value in the West.

Yet the tenacity with which hatred of religion is rooted in Communism may be judged by the example of their most liberal leader, Krushchev: for though he undertook a number of significant steps to extend freedom, Krushchev simultaneously rekindled the frenzied Leninist obsession with destroying religion.

But there is something they did not expect: that in a land where churches have been leveled, where a triumphant atheism has rampaged uncontrolled for two-thirds of a century, where the clergy is utterly humiliated and deprived of all independence, where what remains of the Church as an institution is tolerated only for the sake of propaganda directed at the West, where even today people are sent to the labor camps for their faith, and where, within the camps themselves, those who gather to pray at Easter are clapped in punishment cells – they could not suppose that beneath this Communist steamroller the Christian tradition would survive in Russia.

It is true that millions of our countrymen have been corrupted and spiritually devastated by an officially imposed atheism, yet there remain many millions of believers: it is only external pressures that keep them from speaking out, but, as is always the ca se in times of persecution and suffering, the awareness of God in my country has attained great acuteness and profundity.

It is here that we see the dawn of hope: for no matter how formidably Communism bristles with tanks and rockets, no matter what successes it attains in seizing the planet, it is doomed never to vanquish Christianity.

The West has yet to experience a Communist invasion; religion here remains free. But the West’s own historical evolution has been such that today it too is experiencing a drying up of religious consciousness.

It too has witnessed racking schisms, bloody religious wars, and rancor, to say nothing of the tide of secularism that, from the late Middle Ages onward, has progressively inundated the West.

This gradual sapping of strength from within is a threat to faith that is perhaps even more dangerous than any attempt to assault religion violently from without.

Imperceptibly, through decades of gradual erosion, the meaning of life in the West has ceased to be seen as anything more lofty than the “pursuit of happiness,”  a goal that has even been solemnly guaranteed by constitutions.

The concepts of good and evil have been ridiculed for several centuries; banished from common use, they have been replaced by political or class considerations of short lived value. It has become embarrassing to state that evil makes its home in the individual human heart before it enters a political system.

Yet it is not considered shameful to make dally concessions to an integral evil. Judging by the continuing landslide of concessions made before the eyes of our very own generation, the West is ineluctably slipping toward the abyss.

Western societies are losing more and more of their religious essence as they thoughtlessly yield up their younger generation to atheism.

If a blasphemous film about Jesus is shown throughout the United States, reputedly one of the most religious countries in the world, or a major newspaper publishes a shameless caricature of the Virgin Mary, what further evidence of godlessness does one need?

When external rights are completely unrestricted, why should one make an inner effort to restrain oneself from ignoble acts?

Or why should one refrain from burning hatred, whatever its basis – race, class, or ideology? Such hatred is in fact corroding many hearts today. Atheist teachers in the West are bringing up a younger generation in a spirit of hatred of their own society.

Amid all the vituperation we forget that the defects of capitalism represent the basic flaws of human nature, allowed unlimited freedom together with the various human rights; we forget that under Communism (and Communism is breathing down the neck of all moderate forms of socialism, which are unstable) the identical flaws run riot in any person with the least degree of authority; while everyone else under that system does indeed attain “equality”– the equality of destitute slaves.

This eager fanning of the flames of hatred is becoming the mark of today’s free world. Indeed, the broader the personal freedoms are, the higher the level of prosperity or even of abundance–the more vehement, paradoxically, does this blind hatred become.

The contemporary developed West thus demonstrates by its own example that human salvation can be found neither in the profusion of material goods nor in merely making money.

This deliberately nurtured hatred then spreads to all that is alive, to life itself, to the world with its colors, sounds, and shapes, to the human body. The embittered art of the twentieth century is perishing as a result of this ugly hate, for art is fruitless without love.

In the East art has collapsed because it has been knocked down and trampled upon, but in the West the fall has been voluntary, a decline into a contrived and pretentious quest where the artist, instead of attempting to reveal the divine plan, tries to put himsef in the place of God.

Here again we witness the single outcome of a worldwide process, with East and West yielding the same results, and once again for the same reason: Men have forgotten God.

With such global events looming over us like mountains, nay, like entire mountain ranges, it may seem incongruous and inappropriate to recall that the primary key to our being or non-being resides in each individual human heart, in the heart’s preference for specific good or evil.

Yet this remains true even today, and it is, in fact, the most reliable key we have. The social theories that promised so much have demonstrated their bankruptcy, leaving us at a dead end.

The free people of the West could reasonably have been expected to realize that they are beset by numerous freely nurtured falsehoods, and not to allow lies to be foisted upon them so easily.

All attempts to find a way out of the plight of today’s world are fruitless unless we redirect our consciousness, in repentance, to the Creator of all: without this, no exit will be illumined, and we shall seek it in vain.

The resources we have set aside for ourselves are too impoverished for the task. We must first recognize the horror perpetrated not by some outside force, not by class or national enemies, but within each of us individually, and within every society.

This is especially true of a free and highly developed society, for here in particular we have surely brought everything upon ourselves, of our own free will. We ourselves, in our daily unthinking selfishness, are pulling tight that noose…

Our life consists not in the pursuit of material success but in the quest for worthy spiritual growth. Our entire earthly existence is but a transitional stage in the movement toward something higher, and we must not stumble and fall, nor must we linger fruitlessly on one rung of the ladder.

Material laws alone do not explain our life or give it direction. The laws of physics and physiology will never reveal the indisputable manner in which the Creator constantly, day in and day out, participates in the life of each of us, unfailingly granting us the energy of existence; when this assistance leaves us, we die.

And in the life of our entire planet, the Divine Spirit surely moves with no less force: this we must grasp in our dark and terrible hour.

To the ill-considered hopes of the last two centuries, which have reduced us to insignificance and brought us to the brink of nuclear and non-nuclear death, we can propose only a determined quest for the warm hand of God, which we have so rashly and self-confidently spurned.

Only in this way can our eyes be opened to the errors of this unfortunate twentieth century and our bands be directed to setting them right.

There is nothing else to cling to in the landslide: the combined vision of all the thinkers of the Enlightenment amounts to nothing.

Our five continents are caught in a whirlwind. But it is during trials such as these that the highest gifts of the human spirit are manifested. If we perish and lose this world, the fault will be ours alone.

[For all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Tuesday, 19 April 2011

Parcuri prietenoase, un motiv pentru a-ţi fi dor de Londra [Friendly parks, a reason to miss London]

Deşi cu punerea în aplicare (enforcement) a reglementărilor stricte de orice fel nu stăm prea bine şi mai sunt destule fericite excepţii, în mai toate parcurile din marile oraşe ale României atingerea ierbii face obiectul unei interdicţii (ban/prohibition). 

Ca un absurd tabu (taboo), asemănător celor păstrate din generaţie în generaţie de aborigenii din Australia sau alte popoare din Oceania sau Africa), nu ai voie să calci iarba, deşi nimeni nu ar putea explica exact de ce. 

Ori găseşti scris Nu călcaţi iarba!” (Don’t walk on the grass!), ori există gardieni, paznici, vistavoi, caralii etc care să îţi spună, mai politicos sau bădărăneşte, că nu e voie” (it’s not allowed to). 

În mod stupid ridicaţi la rang de badigarzi’ (bodyguards) în limba română vorbită a zilelor noastre, personajele acestea nu au un echivalent prin parcurile din Londra. 

Acolo este fixaţia de dată recentă cu fără poze ale poliţiştilor’ (No photos of Bobbies), dar iarba este la… liber. 

Nu, desigur că nu iarba de fumat (pot, grass, weed), ci aceea de... călcat cu tălpile, spinarea sau pulpele întinse la soare.   

Cum vine primăvara, chiar de nu este prea mult soare (ar fi stupid să-l aştepţi într-o ţară ca în UK), britanicii ies la/pe...iarbă.

Lipsite de interdicţii mi-au părut şi parcurile din Roma, dar fenomenul este de masăîn Londra, deci şi unul dintre motivele pentru care să-ţi placă această metropolă. 

Poate de aceea, melancolic fiind, oi şi fi simţit nevoia unei mici lecţii de limba engleză în paranteze, precum în altă postare :-)

[Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la/For all the posts on this blog go to: Contents/Cuprins]

Wednesday, 13 April 2011

Material wealth and British unhappiness [Bunăstare materială şi nefericire britanică]

If I said this ‘by myself’, I could be easily accused of being ‘an anti-British bigot’, but here’s a British scholar saying it for The DailyTelegraph:

Young people now are being brought up grasping for what they don’t have rather than appreciating everything they already do.

For everything we have gained in material wealth and sophistication in recent years, we have lost in happiness and the overall richness of the fabric of society.

If we don’t act now, in the future we are likely to see increased levels of adolescent suicide and mental illness, and a culture in which taking anti-depressant drugs is the norm.”

This is today’s money-centered Britain, where a few sane minds (see this Action forHappiness) are trying to warn that things can’t go on like this.

Raising children in a society where ‘meaning of life = financial success’ is a recipe for disaster, and the Brits are already reaping the poisonous fruits of this nihilistic ideology.

Where could have secularism, atheism, hedonism, consumerism, promiscuity lead if not to a an atomised society where only 30% (down from 60%, some 50 years ago) of people trust their fellow human beings?

I like the slogan of Action for Happiness (“Let’s put the things that matter first”), however, I feel that it is but a pipe-dream.

How many of the young people (from Britain or any other country) born in the past 2-3 decades could escape the spell of this materialistic outlook on life?

It’s nice to wish  putting the things that matter ‘first’ – but what actually matters, apart from every ‘I, me, mine, myself’ in this selfish world?

Could this self-centerd modern world where Christianity is uprooted find the way back to our Lord’s definition of happiness – the beatitudes?

Who of us is – apart so very few :-( – ready to be poor in spirit, mournful, thirsty after righteousness, meek, giving up all the nothings that apparently enrich our modern lives, so that we could find true happiness?

[For all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Friday, 8 April 2011

[EN] No comment / [RO] Fără comentarii (7) – Big Brother’s eyes / Ochii lui Big Brother

[EN] Although Great Britain ‘sets the standard’ (pics 1, 2, 5), it would be unfair not to admit a worrisome truth. [RO] Deşi Marea Britanie stabileşte etalonul’ (pozele 1, 2, 5), ar fi necinsit să nu admit un adevăr îngrijorător.
[EN] That many other countries are catching up with the British model[RO]multe alte ţări prind din urmă modelul britanic

[EN] Video surveillance is now omnipresent… not only in countries under Communist rule, like China (pic 6), but also in sunny Italy (pic 4)… [RO] Supravegherea video este acum omniprezentă… nu doar în ţări sub regim comunist, precum China (poza 6), dar şi în însorita Italie (poza 4)…

[EN] …up to every Romanian county (pics 3, 7); and I’ve travelled to 31 of 41 (42 with Bucharest) in the past three years. [RO] … până la fiecare judeţ românesc (pozele 3, 7); şi am călătorit în 31 din 41 (42 cu Bucureşti) in ultimii trei ani.

[EN] What are we afraid of? What do these ‘electronic eyes’ see more than ordinary people could see? [RO] De ce ne temem? Ce văd aceşti ochi electronici’ mai mult decât oameni obişnuiţi ar putea vedea?

[EN] Are the ‘security benefits’ of this huge infrastructure outweighing the costs? [RO] Cântăresc ‘beneficiile de securitate’ ale acestei uriaşe infrastructuri mai mult decât costurile?

[EN] Are there any computers scanning everything that is recorded? Are (compromising) images picked arbitrarily? [RO] Există computere care scanează tot ce este înregistrat? Sunt imaginile (compromiţătoare) alese arbitrar?

[For all the episodes of this series, and all the posts on this blog go to/Pentru toate episoadele din această serie şi toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la: Contents/Cuprins]

Wednesday, 6 April 2011

Mai poate ‘vinde’ ceva creştinismul în UE? [Can Christianity still ‘sell’ anything in the EU?]

Asemenea altora, şi turcii încercă să îşi vândă ‘marfa’ (însoritele destinaţii turistice) şi să adapteze mesajul pentru mult doriţii clienţi. În acest scop, ‘moştenirea creştină’ de pe teritoriul actualei republici turce nu este nicidecum de lepădat.

În plan politic, mesajul pare binevenit pentru intenţiile de promovare (nu doar turistică) ale Ankarei. Mai ales când se adresează unor cetăţeni ostili aderării Turciei la UE.

Adică unor europeni care invocă adesea adesea diferenţele dintre civilizaţia europeană (seculară) şi cultura musulmană a acestei ţări, a cărei populaţie este aşteptată să o depăşească pe cea a Germaniei – fie că va fi primită vreodată în UE, fie că nu.

Iată, noi suntem o ţară seculară, care păstrăm tot ceea ce am moştenit, inclusiv din civilizaţia creştină”, pare să spună mesajul postat pe o media foarte bună pentru reclame în UK, un automobil taxi produs de Manganeze Bronze.

Oficial, autorităţile din UK (alături de cele din Suedia, Italia, Portugalia, Spania, România) susţin aderarea Turciei şi poate nici cetăţenii britanici n-or fi dintre cei mai înverşunaţi adversari ai ideii (precum austriecii, danezii, germanii, francezii etc).

Apoi, probabil că gradul de toleranţă al secularelor autorităţi turce faţă de creştinism nu este mai mic decât cel al ultra-secularilor, umaniştilor şi excesiv de politic corecţilor care dictează valorile dezirabile în actuala societate britanică.

Din perspectivă strict turistică, obiectivul campaniei de promovare pare să fi fost atins în rândurile publicului din UK – o creştere de 10% a turiştilor britanici în Turcia în 2010 (poza făcută de mine este din 2009).

Din perspectivă politică, mai poate vreo campanie de imagine să-l arunce pe ‘NU’ din braţele a milioane de europeni care nu îşi mai amintesc a se defini drept creştini decât atunci când se văd în opoziţie cu ne-creştina, dar nu mai puţin seculara Turcie?

[Pentru toate postările de pe acest blog mergi la/For all the posts on this blog go to: Contents/Cuprins]